The word “conflict” might be the best descriptor for what we see taking place today. At this stage governments may still be in a posturing phase for war and not yet involved in outright violent, open combat. Government anti-UFO activity hasn’t quite reached the level of a public war like that portrayed in the movie “Independence Day.” The diligent work of George Filer (Filer’s Files) appears to show that on-going UFO events continue to unfold. The term ET is used in this essay to generally describe race(s) which may be determined to either destroy Earth - or take control of our planet.

With the well established public sightings of flying saucers, triangles, buildings, cubes and other unexplained flying objects, its past time to ask “What is government doing about the problem?” There is a large, growing body of evidence that these activities are from un-noticed by government.

Recently, a commercial jetliner landed with the plane’s nose cone flattened inward. A crushed nose cone is extremely rare, and such an impact would create a tremendous noise in the cockpit. But nothing was mentioned about what struck the aircraft or any loud noise heard. What’s most interesting about this is that the highest air pressure on an aircraft is on the underside of the wings and fuselage which is the source of lift aerodynamically. Yet we can clearly see it is the upper area of the nose cone that was crushed:

Fig. 1 – Northwest Flight 478 on July 6, 2008

If the object had struck only a few feet higher, it would have broken the windshield and probably killed the crew from flying glass, metal and sudden decompression, likely resulting in a 100% fatality of all on board. After such a disaster, it would be very difficult to reconstruct exactly what caused it after the wreckage falls several miles to Earth.

Fig.2 – Enlargement of Fig 1 with added red line showing a straight edge of an unknown object which appears to have caused the damage. This would be the kind of damage expected from a circular object striking the aircraft. Yellow arrows show contact points where paint was removed by the edge of an unknown object. If these marks were not caused by an unknown object, what is the probability these three randomly damaged areas would form a nearly perfect straight line? Several seams are visible on the nose cone at the 10:00, 12:00 and 3:00 positions, but these three marks are not near any of these seams.

No one has said anything further about this incident, even though it seems certain the pilots must have seen what the object was. It’s obvious that no bird could have done this kind of damage. Note the rip near the 5:00 position.

Most likely not another word will be heard about this incident. Government officials wouldn’t want to “alarm the public” by making them aware that unauthorized spacecraft could easily collide with any plane they fly on, and possibly completely destroy it.

Current treatment by the government of eyewitnesses who report sightings of strange aerial vehicles to the FAA has included sending them to other government agencies, such as the Weather Bureau. Such was the treatment given to a family member and his friends when they sighted a spacecraft several years ago together on summer evening about 9:30PM. None of them were drinking or doing drugs. While the spacecraft hovered close to the group for several minutes, they clearly saw several figures standing in the windows of the spacecraft.

So what was their reward for reporting this flight hazard to the FAA like good citizens? They drove to the nearest airport, but The FAA referred them to the Weather Bureau (!) Yet this spacecraft which the group spotted was close to the glide path for commercial air traffic for that same airport. It makes one wonder how many airplane crashes are the result of UFO collisions, but were instead blamed on weather, mechanical failure or pilot error to cover it up.

Many have claimed that a future conflict with UFOs will be a fabricated war that doesn’t really exist, and will be used to unify world governments into the NWO. For many years I too, also wondered if this wasn’t the case. But now the evidence that something IS happening has become undeniable. The idea of a fabricated war by the NWO or some other group plays well into conspiracy theories and to those who want to deny other outside Earth exists. To many people this is as irresistible as free illegal drugs are to an addict.

Perhaps if a live network television camera at high noon captures the sound of an explosion, a spacecraft making a strafing run overhead and burned metallic junk starts falling out of the sky landing in someone’s front yard, people may finally start to believe a war is actually underway. But that too, might be covered up if it hasn’t been already. '

The crash near Kecksburg, PA is yet another great example of a public sighting that was boldly covered up to this day. A crashed object (which several witnesses walked up to and examined) was whisked away by military forces through the middle of town on a flat bed truck, only a few hours after it crash-landed. Researchers have found that Kecksburg citizens are divided over what happened to this very day. Then the entire event faded into history… or did it?

When government cannot refute a large volume of physical evidence and there are too many eyewitnesses to discredit, what can it do to silence investigators? Simply destroy the evidence. Such was the case with the infamous Kecksburg, PA UFO sighting. In July 2008, NASA now says it has LOST all the data regarding the Kecksburg case. [4] How convenient. NASA has no interest in whatsoever of revealing alien life of any kind.

OK NASA, so you claim you have lost the documents? You’re also the same agency that recently also claimed it “lost several dozen boxes of one inch wide reels of video tapes from the historic Apollo mission,” too.

But how did you “lose” that big crashed, intact Kecksburg object - one so large that it had to be carted away on a flat-bed truck – with NASA personnel present that night? Explain that one to the world.

What happened to the dozens of men involved in that move, and WHERE was the spacecraft taken? Was it taken to a top-secret research facility and then to a top secret UFO museum? Even if NASA lost all the documents, photos, data and the spacecraft – where are the eyewitnesses? Certainly some of these people are still alive, including the young boy present that night the UFO crashed. He’s an adult who is alive and well today.

NASA, you’ve pushed the limits of credibility right over the edge of the conspiracy cliff. This is yet another example of a cover-up of the highest order. Even if somehow this was a military satellite of some type, there is no doubt that it was completely obsolete technology at least 20 years ago.

Some of the evidence of the on-going conflict includes video of firing an advanced weapon into space as captured by Space Shuttle mission STS-48. It seems no one has put this into the context of an attempt to protect Earth. A luminescent object at night is visible in the video as it traveled near Earth in a low orbit altitude some distance from the shuttle, perhaps about 100 miles away near the horizon.

In the video the unknown spacecraft makes a sudden right-angle turn out towards space. A few seconds later a luminescent burst of energy (or a perhaps a missile) traveling at high velocity just misses the unknown spacecraft. Someone recorded the downlink video at the time of the event which has since been posted on numerous websites. NASA has never released any comments on this event. [1]

The apparent delay in firing upon the object may have taken place for several reasons, though not necessarily limited to these four theories:

1. It took time to identify (in military parlance friend or foe) the vehicle identity was malevolent before giving the order to fire upon it.

2. Ground based weaponry required time for charging, tracking and aiming before firing at a suspected malevolent spacecraft. Target acquisition and weapon charging time would be sensitive and important for any enemy, whether terrestrial or extra-terrestrial.

3. It was a (secret) spacecraft made on Earth. It was fired upon because it was deviating from a planned course and it was imperative the technology did not fall into the wrong hands.

4. This incident was a secret DoD test to see if a ground-based system could destroy a test vehicle sent into space. The vehicle was turned outward just before the attempt was made as part of the plan. This may also explain how it was coincidentally captured on a payload bay camera. What were the odds of the camera happening to be aimed at the right point above the Earth at the right time?

This is perhaps one of the few examples caught on tape of a defensive/offensive system weapon firing and it probably wasn’t supposed to be publicly aired. However, don’t expect to see another video like that ever again. Right after STS-48, NASA began quietly scrambling all downlink live video from the shuttle. Video is also delayed on the ground, giving ground-based video and audio censers time to remove further revealing information.

Governments like Belgium and Mexico opened up their records of UFO military actions some time ago. Belgium officials announced some years when they began to take the UFO problem seriously. Belgium may be a tiny country by most standards, but to its credit it still manages to support and maintain an air force. Their air force is always in a high state of readiness to protect its airspace specifically against incursions by UFOs.

There appears to be a substantial increase in sightings in the UK. Information released in the UK on UFO activity is being unclassified by that government. We can be certain that only relatively benign events will be disclosed and not the entire truth.

It is unlikely there will ever be full and open disclosure, as some interactions between ET and humans are well known to be very unsettling and may affect some people’s religious beliefs depending on their particular religion. But in the end, people will adjust to it.

One of many possible reasons for the recent release of UFO information in the UK may be for propaganda purposes. This could be used to prepare their population for the upcoming war with an ET race(s). It would be foolish to think this is being done as a result of public pressure. History shows the UK government (like all governments) has little regard for pressure exerted upon it by the populace in certain matters.

Considering the countless eyewitness reports worldwide showing an increasing frequency of abduction events, there leaves little doubt that something is indeed happening. UFO events leave trace evidence behind, which UFO investigators may ignore as a result of a lack of awareness of it. One example of often ignored trace evidence is lingering effects of advanced drive systems on local space-time. The following will explore some detectable characteristics of disturbing the continuum.

DISTURBANCES TO THE CONTINUUM

The continuum (more commonly known as “space-time” in modern physics) represents all areas of space in our universe including the atmosphere around Earth. Space-time is called this today by physicists instead of just space, because it is believed that wherever there is space there is also the passage of time. We will take this one step further, and state that wherever there is both space AND matter there is the passage of time.

It is well known today the space between planets and galaxies contains matter of all kinds from solids to gasses. Space isn’t a pure vacuum as once thought a century ago. In an earlier essay, I explored my theory that time is passing far slower for the two Voyager spacecraft which left our solar system a few years ago. These are both still functioning after 35 years, since they were thermoelectrically powered by a small hot nuclear source.

When advanced spacecraft (without rocket propulsion) hover over a home, they too affect the time on clocks. This has a cumulative effect.

Although still unproven, our continuum is probably linked to parallel universes down at the quantum level. All physical objects in our reality occupy the continuum at some location. The exact nature of the continuum of course, is still not completely understood. But we will look at examples of how disturbances to the continuum can be detected and the role this plays in the conflict with ET.

Devices that generate true free energy are tapping into a form of energy which is both invisible and not completely understood, but believed to be practically limitless. (We will not delve into that huge discussion area of countless free energy devices here.) Tapping into free energy source is similar to using a measuring cup to quickly scoop a cup of water out of a swimming pool. The void created in the water is rapidly filled in and the water soon returns to a settled state, even though waves radiate outward from the event. But in the case of the free energy, the source of replenishment is even faster and essentially infinite, which is the universe itself.

Like stirring a bowl of water, the local continuum can be disturbed and this can be detected. It can also be caused to rotate invisibly. Gravity is one of the visible manifestations which results from distorting the continuum. At a free energy conference a few years ago an electronic detector was demonstrated, which was basically a capacitor connected to a very high gain amplifier and a speaker. A glass bowl of water was stirred near the detector with a wooden spoon, and repeated clicking sounds were heard in the speaker. When the bowl of water was removed the clicks could still be heard!

So how could this be possible? The stirred bowl of water is a moving mass, and moving masses couple into the local area of the continuum. This is because the rotating mass of water (which although quite small still has its own microgravity) causes the continuum around it to rotate. The infamous Henry Cavendish experiment performed in 1797-1798 proved that a stationary lead ball mounted on a fixed post exerts a measurable amount of gravity. And likewise, so would a bowl of water.

Dowsing is an ancient art that detects distortions in the continuum. In an older television documentary designed to test dowsing, there were two rows of storage buildings on a farm in the English countryside. First, dowsers were brought in to confirm the area did not provide any readings. After the dowsers left, one of the solid overheard doors was raised at the end of one building which revealed a small wooden box about the size of a cigar box mounted on a tripod. This box contained a microwave source. A key activated it and for several seconds a few watts of microwave energy beamed across the area at an angle between the two buildings. Then the beam was switched off and the overhead door closed. The following day dowsers were brought back to the property, and each dowser obtained a deflection of their dowsing rods across the very same area where the beam was aimed.

Were dowsers detecting microwave energy from the day before? Certainly not. Microwaves are simply another form of electromagnetic energy, like light from a lamp. When any source of energy is turned off electromagnetic energy will vanish. However, dowsers were actually detecting the disturbance of the local continuum near the surface of the Earth. But the continuum is present everywhere, even inside matter. This also explains why water, wires, pipes and other objects can be detected by dowsers. If matter exists in any form it will affect the continuum. Even solid matter still has tiny spaces between molecules.

Stirred water and the microwave test are excellent examples which show that the continuum is similar to water in a swimming pool. Disturbances in the continuum can be detected with the right equipment.

Disturbing the continuum is similar to rotating the water in a round swimming pool. In an above-ground circular pool, one or two 60 pound children running about 15-20 times around the inside of the pool wall will cause the entire mass of water weighing several tons to rotate and create small vortex. The water will continue to rotate for some time after the running stops. If the children stop and then try to walk against the current they will not be able to. We often did this as children in a 20ft. diameter pool at a cousin’s home. But at the time as children we didn’t recognize the relevance of this simple experiment with regard to the continuum.

It isn’t about how much energy is used, but the way the energy is used to disturb the continuum. The same applies to weather control as well, making weather front formation or storm course alteration possible using energy beams from satellites or other sources. Like many actions in physics, this could also work in reverse - if the continuum is rotated so will the matter within that region. But that subject is outside the scope of this essay.

Sound signatures in the ocean created by boat and ship propellers are a highly developed area of military science, dating back about 80 years to the earliest days of hydrophone systems. Hydrophone operators aboard ships and submarines were trained to listen for propeller signatures in water. Hydrophone seamen performed friend of foe identification based on the sounds heard. Today, hydrophones connected to computers aboard ships and subs perform the same task in a matter of seconds and display the result.

So what does disturbing the continuum and hydrophones have to do with a conflict with ET? When a spacecraft using non-rocket propulsion travels near the Earth’s surface (such as near an abductee’s home) it will leave a signature from disturbing the continuum. Gravity itself is actually a disturbance or warping of the continuum. Some (if not all) of these propulsion systems may distort the local continuum to create propulsion, which should not be confused with anti-gravity.

There may be occasions when the military is unable to identify spacecraft when the vehicle was present over someone’s home or area. It is possible that at the time the spacecraft was present, surveillance satellites were focused on another area of interest. Perhaps the military detected a general disturbance in the continuum from another general Earth surveillance system, or the abductee’s story was found on the internet using an automated scanning system. This would be quite easy to do, since the entire internet passes through a complex computerized routing system owned by none other than the National Security Agency.

A signature in the continuum for a spacecraft’s propulsion system will most likely remain in a given area for some time. This also explains the presence of black helicopters frequently seen hovering near the homes of abductees after an abduction event. Helicopter crews are probably more interested in what spacecraft was present, and not in the abductees themselves. Sometimes helicopters are seen before an abduction event, too. Perhaps they are recording the continuum signature for reference purposes.

Fig.3 – Chinook helicopter similar to those often seen over homes of abductees. Often a bright white light is seen on the center bottom-side of these aircraft in the daytime (not visible here.) Many are painted black or have no identifiable markings. [6]

more:

http://data4science.net/essays.php?EssayID=807

permanent link